Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+class\s+reclassings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+class\s+reclassings\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@spec-rx7.org>; Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 21:50:21 -0500; My picks regarding http://www.scca.org/news/tech/seb/6-4-00.html#memo1 Class 1 SDS (Super-Duper Stock?) - I'm afraid the Viper GTS will be the car to have. Has anyone proven the C5 is better than the; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00127.html (8,515 bytes)
2. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 23:19:46 EDT; << Class 1 SDS (Super-Duper Stock?) - I'm afraid the Viper GTS will be the car to have. Has anyone proven the C5 is better than the C4? Will this class be like T1 in road racing where they're lucky i; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00129.html (8,326 bytes)
3. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <brianberryhill@usa.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:43:53 -0500; This will prove interesting, since Vipers are very expensive and not too many show up where I'm at. The ones that do show up are usually the average joe types that can't finish with a raw time middl; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00131.html (9,262 bytes)
4. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 00:05:52 -0400; Let us not forget Last time I checked Mr. Jim Harnish still has his national champion winning stock class Viper keeping his garage warm :-) Jeff Lloyd This will prove interesting, since Vipers are ve; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00133.html (9,042 bytes)
5. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: reddog_es22@juno.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 01:26:46 -0500; I think that the current E-stock Neon would be a pretty good car to have in Group 9. Really like the mix in Group 8 in particular. Any opinions on the SVO? This should be fun to watch! Scott Sawyer '; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00135.html (8,233 bytes)
6. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Michael Lee" <solo2inseattle@wa.freei.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 01:18:48 -0700; I think that if the classing goes through there are gonna be alot of neons going up for sale. Looking over last year's results the only neon that posted a faster time than the type R was Mr Mark Dadd; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00139.html (9,368 bytes)
7. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@spec-rx7.org>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 08:06:55 -0500; So it's ok to get creamed by Mark Daddio in a Neon but not Bob Endicott in a Type R? What's the difference? And if the new Neon is faster than the old you're not going to be served by Chrysler eithe; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00142.html (8,976 bytes)
8. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 06:31:42 -0700; Nope - sold. And IMHO, that '1st gen' R/T wouldn't be the car to have. GTS all the way. AB Let us not forget Last time I checked Mr. Jim Harnish still has his national champion winning stock class Vi; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00145.html (9,528 bytes)
9. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:36:54 -0500; The rest of us mortal neon drivers would get creamed. Also keep in mind that there is still more speed to be had out of that ITR while the neon has had all of it's development. Maybe I'm wrong but th; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00150.html (9,046 bytes)
10. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Michael King <mapco@att.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:41:51 -0700; Actually, after a little info from Mark D. last year, I even posted a faster time in the challenge than all the Type R's at the Pro Finale. I believe the Neon, personally, would be competitively clas; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00151.html (10,148 bytes)
11. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:07:31 -0700; Given that the E30 M3 is listed in Stock 5 (and is moving to GS next year - does anyone remember when that was put up for member input? - I must have flaked and not seen that) I think that will be ev; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00153.html (10,908 bytes)
12. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:57:20 -0700; E30 M3 specs Weight: 2735 0-60: 7.6 1/4: 15.7 AB Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com> on 07/06/2000 11:07:31 AM Please respond to Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com> To: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net> cc:; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00159.html (11,429 bytes)
13. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:55:52 -0700; Thanks for the additional link, Andy! My initial data came from : http://www.artglenn.com/bmwm3/ (choose 'Engine') 0-60: 6.9 1/4: 15.2@92 A link there shows 7.1 and 15.4 (from European Car magazine); /html/autox/2000-07/msg00166.html (13,779 bytes)
14. RE: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:57:24 -0700; Dan Maloney here in AZ has M Coupe with all the goodeies: JRZ triples, chrash bolts, you name it, it has it. I do not think it can beat a vette. In fact Dan just got a C5 hardtop and in his first eve; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00172.html (10,295 bytes)
15. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Michael Lee" <solo2inseattle@wa.freei.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:01:17 -0700; The difference as I see it is that, although D-stock and G-stock are very heavily contested classes. Bob Endicott won G-stock by about 1/10th of a second, with all the cars pretty close most of the w; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00207.html (10,248 bytes)
16. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Popsracr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:05:12 EDT; << I've never met daddio or watched him drive but that must have been a superhuman (and unlikely for us regular joe's to duplicate) effort to get the car that fast. >> I think you've discovered the s; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00222.html (8,980 bytes)
17. Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@spec-rx7.org>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 23:30:22 -0500; "I'm also worried about the E30 M3's in class 5. They could be the class killer. I don't want them there, but where else do they fit?" CS? -- Jeff Cashmore 95 Toyota Celica ST = E-Stock http://www.sp; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00227.html (8,723 bytes)
18. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: Mike Lamfalusi <lamfalus@excite.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:11:54 -0700 (PDT); get Jeff name Nolifta Yes, they do seem to posess super human driving skills and I would love to be able to some day equal their capabilities. In certain cases though, like in DS with Daddio, I bet t; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00259.html (10,392 bytes)
19. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:38:23 -0700; I talked with Mark at Nationals last year, and he likes his cars to be set up in an interesting way. True, his car was different from a lot of the other Neons in setup, but he's of the opinion that m; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00263.html (11,594 bytes)
20. Re: Stock class reclassings (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <conekiller@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:23:01 -0400; This is a proposal to class cars not drivers. DS is a victim of Daddio's success. If Daddio proved that the Type R and the Neon can run together, then they should be classed together. Rick Cone -- Or; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00274.html (9,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]