- 1. Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:45:39 -0800
- Hi all, I don't have my rulebook here at work and am trying to find the wording for the shock absorber tolerance that I think was added semi-recently. I thought there was a fastrack or Appendix G ite
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00711.html (7,082 bytes)
- 2. Re: Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:51:56 -0800
- Last year's wording was a 1" variance in extended length - but spring perch position remains the same.
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00713.html (7,480 bytes)
- 3. Re: Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:26:49 EST
- The rule specifically states *overall extended length* to accomodate multiple applications for a given item. There is also a rule in SIIR, Sect. 13.4: G. Suspension geometry and range of travel may n
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00718.html (6,700 bytes)
- 4. RE: Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:48:38 -0800
- That leads to the question of what 'overall extended length' means. I could read it two ways: 1) the top to bottom length, regardless of mounting locations (i.e. top perch boss). That seems silly. A
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00724.html (8,449 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu