Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Maserati\s+but\s+not\s+Porsche\s+\(\s+was\s+re\:\s+SM\s+Inclusion\s+List\s+\)\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:24:29 -0500 (EST)
Alan wrote... So lemme get this straight; Paul's 944 isn't allowed in SM because the 'Porsche' name will scare off kids in Hondas... but Maserati's are fine? ( Yes, I realize how heavy they are, I'm
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00408.html (8,200 bytes)

2. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:20:41 EST
1) Most of those kids don't even know the name Maserati, much less have ever seen a "real" Maserati. 2) I'm assuming they'd have to actually be at an event in order to not return because they were be
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00421.html (8,534 bytes)

3. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 13:35:20 -0500
Funny - ran a local Toledo event last summer with Ryanthe-17-year-old's Pinto. He ran in FSP, I looked for another class. Wheels too wide for STR, so I ran in SM. Most of THOSE younger folks had no i
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00423.html (8,689 bytes)

4. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:43:24 -0800
Very funny!! )))))
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00429.html (8,922 bytes)

5. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:35:05 EST
Reminds me of my early days in CSP. I built an RX-3 when SP went National in '83. All the young punks with their RX-2s, 3s and 510s thought I was cheating because my RX-3 sounded different, and this
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00432.html (8,958 bytes)

6. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:03:59 -0500 (EST)
Where it should be. My idea of SM's demographic doesn't include ancient cars that you have to be 50+ to have ever seen new. Mark (who's running a 15 year old car in CP and standing in a buncha glass
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00449.html (8,389 bytes)

7. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:19:17 -0600
<quoting Roger> Hahahaha. Yeah, SM should be very afraid of Pintos. Uhhh, lessee here, they're, ahh, rare. Yeah, that's it. Ford only made, what 3 or 4 million of them, right? And, uhh, oh yeah, they
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00452.html (10,136 bytes)

8. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:16:21 EST
Let's see, the last Pinto was made in '80. If you were 10 in '80, you'd be 30 now. Of course, today's 30 year olds were playing with computers when they were 10, not cars, so I'm guessing that Pintos
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00453.html (8,675 bytes)

9. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 15:53:27 -0500
You know, you're s'posed to remove the bolts and glue BEFORE you remove the glass and replace it with Lexan...... <grin> Mike CP58
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00454.html (8,027 bytes)

10. Re: Maserati but not Porsche ( was re: SM Inclusion List ) (score: 1)
Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:18:38 -0500 (EST)
I think you are underestimating these 'kids'. In my experience, they know quite a bit about cars, and while they may never have seen one, they all know that 'my Maserati does 185.' And a 944 strikes
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00530.html (8,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu