- 1. FSAE (score: 1)
- Author: eah6@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:54:47 -0500
- Actually, if you look at the top teams from the past few years, wings were the exception, not the norm. Fairly large wings are required to generate any useful downforce at these speeds and the wings
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg00244.html (7,230 bytes)
- 2. FSAE (score: 1)
- Author: eah6@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:58:48 -0500
- Moveable aerodynamics are not allowed. Ed.
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg00245.html (6,476 bytes)
- 3. Re: FSAE (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:36:57 -0600
- I am told by someone on a Formula SAE team that the Formula SAE courses are tighter and "slower" than Solo II courses. Since the primary reason to build a Formula SAE car is to run on a Formula SAE c
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg00300.html (8,591 bytes)
- 4. Re: FSAE (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 99 10:41:41 -0500
- I dunno. The courses seem pretty much the speed of regional Solo II courses to me. The major differences being the vast tracts of parking lot that can be used at the Silverdome site. The endurance co
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg00313.html (8,105 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu