Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Appeal\s+issues\s+discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Appeal\s+issues\s+discussion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Appeal issues discussion (score: 1): Author: "Larry R. Metz" <lrmetz@insightbb.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:22:03 -0500; As a reader o all the discussion of recent on the appeals and rules and disqualifications..... Has anyone ever thought about having a technical inspection offered at major events, to assist drivers i; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00148.html (9,356 bytes)
2. Re: Appeal issues discussion (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:16:30 -0500; IMO, if the local region requires something above and beyond National rules, they must make allowances in their regional rules. (In meeting our regional rule, you are allowed to break a National rul; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00152.html (8,696 bytes)
3. Re: Appeal issues discussion (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:25:27 -0700 (PDT); That's why I don't think something like this would be especially helpful. You aren't going to get a "get out of jail free" card out of it, and short of that, what are you likely to achieve that can't; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00155.html (7,782 bytes)
4. RE: Appeal issues discussion (score: 1): Author: "J. Brett Howell" <jbrett@pebblemotorsports.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:21:48 -0400; The suggestion of compliance checks has been made, in fact implored by several competitors in your class, but the problem is that most people not running in the class have little if any knowledge of; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00162.html (10,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]