- 81. RE: 924s wheel size... (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 08:16:38 -0800
- Hi Again, I've had answers already (thanks John, and Josh2!) on the wheel width (6" front/rear on Non-M030 and 6" Front/7" Rear on M030). Does anyone have a contact (email or phone) for Glen Hernande
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg00974.html (7,221 bytes)
- 82. RE: San Diego (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:15:41 -0800
- It was indeed a great event - the Saturday course was quite a blast, as we still work on sorting out the '99 Miata. But as you'll see below, I can't say much about Sunday's course... :-) Yes indeed!
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg01394.html (9,630 bytes)
- 83. RE: ProSolo Nationals Vs Pro Classes (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:55:37 -0800
- <snip> Ralph Elder ran into a little snag for this at the San Berdoo Pro - I was not able to attend (new daughter and all) so Ralph ran P5 so that Katie Elder could have warm tires. Well, before he
- /html/autox/1999-03/msg01871.html (9,156 bytes)
- 84. RE: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:40:43 -0800
- Hi Phil and all, Back when Jesse Wills had a '92 or '93 Miata, I co-drove with him at an event. Compared to my '95 R, it felt much lighter and more nimble. Less skittish? Not really - Jesse had it se
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00221.html (9,520 bytes)
- 85. Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:45:39 -0800
- Hi all, I don't have my rulebook here at work and am trying to find the wording for the shock absorber tolerance that I think was added semi-recently. I thought there was a fastrack or Appendix G ite
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00711.html (7,082 bytes)
- 86. RE: Revised shock rule (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:48:38 -0800
- That leads to the question of what 'overall extended length' means. I could read it two ways: 1) the top to bottom length, regardless of mounting locations (i.e. top perch boss). That seems silly. A
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00724.html (8,449 bytes)
- 87. RE: Wheels data? (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 07:48:17 -0800
- Pax, or whomever has that list, I'd appreciate a copy as well... Thanks much, Kevin McCormick 1999 BS Miata Sport
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00074.html (6,898 bytes)
- 88. '99 Miata number sizes (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:28:21 -0800
- Hi all, Has anyone (or can anyone) tell me what size number will fit on a '99 Miata? I measured my '95 this morning, and a 10" one will barely fit, and starts going on the curve of the door. I need t
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00820.html (6,654 bytes)
- 89. RE: 99 Miata suspenion (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:00:04 -0800
- I can help here - When we put these on Katie Elder's '99 we had the factory Bilsteins to reference against. We measured the Bilstein first from various points and various methods (using a micrometer)
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg01024.html (8,842 bytes)
- 90. RE: Dennis's hairbrained ideas (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:56:34 -0800
- Seems to me you you'd have to run it in SSC trim - i.e. roll cage, alignment specs, tires sizes... If you did that, then the provision exists for the car to run in it's 'normal' class (ES in this cas
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg01084.html (8,151 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu