Mail Archive Search: <+from:gs96@sgi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:gs96@sgi.net: 168 ]

Total 168 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Stock in Stock - another view (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:54:40 -0400; Thanks, Andy, for hanging with us and voicing your opinions. It's helpful when you and GH share some of the thought processes that go into SEB decision-making. I disagree with you on one point howeve; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01268.html (8,219 bytes)
82. Re: The Classing Picture As A Whole/ss shocks (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:16:39 -0400; Just to clarify a little, - yes, we put Penskes on our 96 Vette- and they do help a ton. They are SINGLE adjustables, they aren't mega-dollar in the scheme of things (DA Konis are mo' money) although; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01304.html (11,968 bytes)
83. slicks vs DOT R-tires (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:47:15 -0400; How much quicker are slicks than Kumhos, etc. for most cars? Is there a rule of thumb? TIA, Kent Rafferty; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01341.html (6,192 bytes)
84. Re: Kit cars in Prepared (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:34:32 -0400; Jay, as much as you'd like to disagree with Ray, your post supports what he's claiming. You concede in your post that Lotus may have made some cars to custom-order. Kent Rafferty Jay admonished:; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01768.html (9,325 bytes)
85. Re: Formula for speed (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:24:06 -0400; Jon, lot's of interesting calculators here: http://www.seansa4page.com/resource/autotech.html Hope that helps, Kent Rafferty; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01770.html (6,824 bytes)
86. Re: 1/4 Mile (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:39:24 -0400; 93 Supra Twin Turbo, boost controller, yada, yada. 1/4: 16.2 @ 86 mph Kent Rafferty :-) SM Supra; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00219.html (7,790 bytes)
87. Re: C-stock wonderings (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:34:28 -0400; Way back when, the Fiero was very competitive - especially at Pro Solos. A *well set up* Fiero should at least be in the ballpark for Solo II stuff - although a lot of development has gone into the M; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00264.html (7,590 bytes)
88. Re: 1/4 Mile (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:52:48 -0400; Okay, I guess I'll have to go to the Test'n'Tune at the local dragstrip tomorrow night. I'll see if I can't shave some time off of that 16.2. :-) I just wish I could launch like Dennis....... Kent Ra; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00370.html (8,970 bytes)
89. Re: FS 93RX7 engine (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 09:05:44 -0400; Sounds like an excellent starting point for a hellish Street Mod car..... Kent Rafferty SM Supra; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00509.html (6,763 bytes)
90. Gear ratios and autoxing (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:48:30 -0400; How does one figure what rear gear ratio would be "optimal" for autocrossing? Is there a "rule-ofthumb" for making this calculation? Kent Rafferty SM Supra; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00521.html (7,391 bytes)
91. Re: Best C4 Vette for Autox? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 14:53:50 -0400; Okay, I'll play. All these choices are course dependent and are highly subjective but here goes: 1. 86 Z51 Automatic - perfect match between tranny and L98 torque, very light at around 3100ish lbs. 2; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00752.html (9,384 bytes)
92. Re: Best C4 Vette for Autox? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:10:27 -0400; I didn't realize the 2001 ZO6 was going to be considered part of the C4 series :-) I'll then have to agree - the ZO6 will be the fastest C4 Vette for autox.......... Kent Rafferty great list for; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00794.html (10,721 bytes)
93. Re: Harrisburg Pro (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:43:01 -0400; And if anybody has doubts about the magic wheel chock - did you see Karen Rafferty's launch in the Ladies challenge? She was half way down the straight before the last yellow came on........and no re; /html/autox/2000-06/msg01080.html (9,216 bytes)
94. Re: ST question (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:12:56 -0400; You can run SM. You can slap a turbo or supercharger on it and still run SM. Come on over....... Kent Rafferty SM Supra; /html/autox/2000-06/msg01097.html (7,326 bytes)
95. Re: Peru NT course concerns (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:49:54 -0400; Yeehaa! They sound like my kind of courses! :-) Seriously, I haven't run a truly open, fast course yet this year, so something on the wild side sounds like fun. With my luck it'll rain both days....; /html/autox/2000-06/msg01723.html (8,050 bytes)
96. Vettes, Fbodies, and LS1s (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:25:24 -0400; It appears the 2001 C5s (ZO6 aside) will have an improved torque curve which should help the C5 autocrossers. I'm guessing the F-bodies will get the same torque improvements so these cars could be a; /html/autox/2000-06/msg01795.html (6,911 bytes)
97. Re: Uh oh, M3s in ESP... again! (was: Re: more peru musings) (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:28:32 -0400; Here's the tally since the M3 moved to E/SP: In 3 Pro Solos: E/SP San Bern. M3s take 1st & 2nd Lemore M3s take 1st & 2nd Peru M3 takes 1st Ave. margin of victory vs. nearest non-m3: 1.5 seconds. L2 S; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00510.html (9,426 bytes)
98. Re: Corvette Z06 - Competition for SS? (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 13:03:09 -0400; This will be a strong car in SS. For a potential downside, I see that the 385 hp is reached at 6000 rpm (torque peak at 4800 rpm). Compare that with an L98 engine's torque peak at idle. :-) With the; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00768.html (8,652 bytes)
99. Re: Was nutty ESP - now Classing cars vs. people (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:56:36 -0400; It didn't look like Danny P was sandbagging to me. Diemer ran well and was within striking range all weekend. Onks and Litterer were also running well. It appeared all of the B/SP cars were tweaked f; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00904.html (12,310 bytes)
100. Porsche 944 Turbo in BP? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 10:43:23 -0500; I was meandering throught the BP listings and noticed the 944T listed with a minimum weight of 2200 lbs, which is about 500 lbs less than the Corvettes. Sounds like a 944T could be competitive in BP; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00008.html (7,170 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]