- 101. Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 08:10:47 -0500
- The Prepared category as a whole has participation issues right now. In fact, one of the topics SEB Chair Colan Arnold brought up at the Town Hall meeting was "How can we get more participation in Pr
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00003.html (11,485 bytes)
- 102. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 08:43:50 -0500
- 1650 and 1750 are the numbers I've heard for AP. It And why wouldn't adding weight to it and leaving in DP not also fix that problem? Certainly cheaper for the Miata driver than upgrading to AP specs
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00006.html (9,142 bytes)
- 103. RE: Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 12:27:56 -0500
- Or how about my comparison of SP cars? You failed to mention that, Rick. maybe be in ASP or BSP with the Vettes instead of CSP? The weight break is already there. Agreed. But not to the exclusion of
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00018.html (9,641 bytes)
- 104. RE: Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:58:01 -0500
- I'm talking about Miatas versus Corvettes (remember the Miata->AP theme of this thread?) In SP, where wheels/tires are unlimited, and the weight differential is already there between Corvettes and M
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00027.html (9,797 bytes)
- 105. RE: Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:54:45 -0500
- Agreed. That's what I was driving at. Agreed again. The key is to look at all factors. If *any* is out of whack, it can dominate the overall equation. That's why I brought up Power-to-weight in the
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00104.html (11,031 bytes)
- 106. Re: Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:59:51 -0500
- seconds, No, that's not what I said. I said that was *incremental* over what a first-rate DP-legal Miata would be. To build said DP-legal Miata in the first place is similar to any first-rate Prepare
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00106.html (13,178 bytes)
- 107. Re: Prepared Miata reclassing thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 20:25:55 -0500
- winning Charlie, maybe you didn't see my other note. The only reason the time difference was so low was that the 2nd place AP car (Platt) coned all of his runs on the one day. Add back in the two-sec
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00107.html (10,611 bytes)
- 108. Nov FasTrack w/ Nats Protest results & Miata Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:22:50 -0500
- Not sure if this has been posted yet, but here's the new FasTrack. It has all of the Nats protes/appeal info, and also some new proposal info. In particular, those of you with an opinion and supporti
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00161.html (7,039 bytes)
- 109. re: Miata Baby teeth (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:29:38 -0500
- Not sure if you really care or not, but to be legal for CSP or SM2 the OEM tow hooks must remain on the car. This is specifically addressed in the rules. But if you run DP (as it says on one of your
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00164.html (7,444 bytes)
- 110. FW: [evolution-disc.] Stock battery clarification (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:02:20 -0500
- Here's the official details on the "missing link" with respect to battery replacement in stock. --Andy Seems "This removes the Stock category allowance of battery make, model, and size changes; batte
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00294.html (7,782 bytes)
- 111. RE: [evolution-disc.] What happened to the Monza Broadcast? (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:30:05 -0500
- It was on network TV today at noon central time. Barricello/Shumacher --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Pa
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00131.html (8,559 bytes)
- 112. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:50:34 -0500
- Oh, please don't apologize Mark! Allow me to ventilate instead. :-) As a Timing Captain for the days that FM ran, I can say that much T&S consternation was caused by the extent to which drivers in t
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00168.html (9,491 bytes)
- 113. RE: [evolution-disc.] Legible numbers (was clarifications to FM (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:13:12 -0500
- Agreed. FM is a pathological case because the numbers are (necessarily) small due to very little sidepod on which to mount them. My letter on this issue has already been sent to the SEB. I propose u
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00171.html (9,223 bytes)
- 114. RE: [evolution-disc.] Legible numbers (was clarifications to FM (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 07:10:48 -0500
- Bingo! Therein lies the rub. In fact, I believe that leniency at National Tours and Pros has encouraged competitors to be lax on number visuals in general. The travelling road show is supposed to br
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00188.html (8,180 bytes)
- 115. RE: [evolution-disc.] RE: Late to grid (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:43:24 -0500
- Mark is sooo right here (did I actually say that? :-) Unless, of course, you really *are* trying to warm your tires and shave it as close as legally possible to gain that extra special advantage over
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00209.html (9,408 bytes)
- 116. RE: [evolution-disc.] FSP Protest (the larger issues?) (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 20:35:46 -0500
- Steve makes some great points in his previous treatice. Put it more simply a mod is not strictly legal unless you have the docs to back it up. No docs, no mod. Unless you feel lucky... --Andy "who ca
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00282.html (7,935 bytes)
- 117. Re: Clutch changes in Stock Class ? (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:53:14 -0500
- I've had this exact conversation with current Nats Chief of Protest Roger the Famous. I had made some public comments similar to what you are saying and Roger contacted me since I also tend to chair
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00382.html (8,343 bytes)
- 118. RE: Stock class steering wheels (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:04:20 -0500
- While your rationale sounds harmless on the surface, these are the kinds of allowances that mushroom into perceived "must have" mods. For example, I can make (or have made) a lighter steering wheel
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00383.html (10,608 bytes)
- 119. Re: Nats Turnout Numbers (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:58:43 -0500
- I thought this too, but heard from an FP competitor at lunch today that AP was given a grace period of something like five years when FP was split back out of it. That was three years ago. Any board
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00469.html (7,611 bytes)
- 120. re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:33:12 -0500
- Not quite, Jim. In the never-ending saga of what to do with the Miata in Prepared (no one seems to want it in *their* class), yet another new proposal will come out in the next FastTrack. The previou
- /html/autox/2002-09/msg00511.html (8,995 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu