Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Choke\s+Cables\s+for\s+SU\s+HS6\s+Conversion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Choke Cables for SU HS6 Conversion (score: 1)
Author: <osternd@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:02:03 -0700
I used a TR4 single choke cable on the rear carb as my SUs had linkage connecting the chokes together. Be careful with those carbs. The rear float bowl is different (offset higher?) for the 2000 as t
/html/6pack/2008-06/msg00184.html (7,900 bytes)

2. Re: [6pack] Choke Cables for SU HS6 Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Lee" <wayne@motorcarriage.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:35:58 -0400
When I did my SU conversion on my 75 TR6 my original front Cable was able to link up fine with the front Choke (enrichment Lever). I left the rear cable to perch itself in front of the rear Carb to l
/html/6pack/2008-06/msg00187.html (9,276 bytes)

3. Re: [6pack] Choke Cables for SU HS6 Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Terry Geiger" <tgeiger@ShoalsBritishCars.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:26:03 -0500
Here are some pictures of my SU HS6 conversion. The carbs are ex-Volvo with spitfire fuel bowls fitted. I used an MGB choke cable; the single TR4 cable should work fine as well. Joe Curto supplied th
/html/6pack/2008-06/msg00189.html (8,332 bytes)

4. [6pack] Choke Cables for SU HS6 Conversion (score: 1)
Author: dmo <osternd@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:35:05 -0400
If I'm not to late on this, I'll take a WAG at it - If I recall correctly, the rear fuel bowl on the Triumph 2000/2500 is mounted 1/8 - 1/4" higher than the front fuel bowl (I'm not sure about the Vo
/html/6pack/2008-06/msg00204.html (9,375 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu