vtr
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VTR Nationals

To: Monica & Jim <monica@snovalley.com>
Subject: Re: VTR Nationals
From: Sherry & Erik <sclose@swbell.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 22:37:06 -0500
Cc: vtr@Autox.Team.Net
References: <33D25BDC.144@sprintmail.com> <33D2672F.2D25AA65@snovalley.com>
Reply-to: Sherry & Erik <sclose@swbell.net>
Sender: owner-vtr@Autox.Team.Net
Amen!

This year the Nationals were local to us. Yet we only entered 2 cars,
due to the stiff fees, among other things. At the regionals - 200 miles
away - we entered 3, because of the lower price. We have 8 Triumphs
total, all in 'good' original condition. Ya know - daily drivers,
dependable, all original, but not concourse. We have 2 kids that really
love their cars (Spider - 1st @ Ntnl's{ok, easy class}, GT6 - 3rd
Rgn:1st autocross). And in April will have a 3rd new driver. But to
choke down the $75 entry fee per car wasn't reasonable this year. 

Sooo... I echo the vote for the freebie section! It was almost as much
fun scouring the parking lot for the 'real' Triumphs as it was looking
at the 'museum' pieces. If not free, how about $5 - $10 for the
non-concourse type cars. After all, they are the work horses that keep
places like TRF, etc. in business.

Thanks,
Sherry & Erik

Monica & Jim wrote:
> 
>  A noble thought Dave,
> However most people aren't going to pay $25. to show they're cars when
> they know there's no way they could even place.
>  Take a look at my car for example. I've entered three shows this summer
> and have
> yet to place. What needs to happen is first judges should make available
> a summery
> of each car entered to the people who entered.
> Second: more classes should be added.
> Third: how about a free section? With say a "people's choice" winner and
> so on....
> Forth: What about ducting points on owners who are real
> assholes....sorry, but there's
> no better way to say it.
> 
>  These are just my opinions.
> 
> -jimb
> http://www.snovalley.com/~monica/jbtr6.html
> 
> Dave Fain wrote:
> 
> > Bill, thanks for the reply.  The last sentence brings up an
> > interesting point:  During the car show, there were Triumphs
> > parked all over the place that were not in the show, probably
> > because their owners felt that they were "not good enough".
> > Maybe next year there needs to be more emphasis on showing
> > the cars in spite of the fact that they may be "works in
> > progress"?  My club (RMTC) tries to do this by stressing
> > that nearly all of those concours winners started out as
> > something ranging from daily drivers to basket cases and
> > that getting ALL the cars out there and just talking to
> > people and being a part of the event is as important as
> > winning trophies.  If they made it to the event in
> > the first place, they are good enough.
> > Dave Fain

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>