To: | Wbeech <wbeech@flash.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] One last question NOW Restrictor flow |
From: | Geo Hahn <ahwahneetr@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:12:52 -0700 |
Cc: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs-archive@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XM7RW/U/Tva2pL7DC/Mo5DBQVnDd6mUr6HdEYBlznYg=; b=lSNJR1tmX9pWtJweutK/i/tKtuj6YnJHVRkGffL+d2fIy977xGV5jkmd4gaT06mB25 a9ejSIvAv0D5v6SSLfmDjF2YVqS36pQsMvEv+wKu/WiDo4WLIX10iyAID0S1hZt4+8Y4 CPo+rWZpI3rFnKzNGBNq0DvN2Ij4VDKraoSuHaEcXxsPDC+2ctT7Kfiy9jWfBfzExg5f GUAo5/efRnv6hODce6IresTa17GAorX0Yt5i9dd9gfTF+a0Q4f4V4wwZvKBJCmSuNPaX kGoSVGYBP5pABwuGDCqULeTAM8WOIcwvZEaCVeDr4GxH0jOtcfoP0WFCwjVu+Ih+WBUF M4kA== |
In-reply-to: | <07FC6A0A08674C21BE08CBCA991F751E@bboffice> |
List-archive: | <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/triumphs> |
List-help: | <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=help> |
List-id: | Triumph Sports car discussion <triumphs.autox.team.net> |
List-post: | <mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net> |
List-subscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs>, <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs>, <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: | <CANhzkePrvC7sobYqiX5E2poH61d=cUaVjyYVKSPy+KWt=ja6Zw@mail.gmail.com> <1399273703.125658.1347830297758.JavaMail.root@sz0059a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <07FC6A0A08674C21BE08CBCA991F751E@bboffice> |
Sender: | triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Wbeech <wbeech@flash.net> wrote: > Reading with interest all this about restricting the bypass hose. What was > the purpose of this bypass and why didn't it work? > The bypass works just fine. The idea (as I understand it) was to help the engine warm-up quickly coolant was circulated through the head via that bypass hose rather than simply sitting there waiting for the thermstat to open. Apart from the benefits to the engine of warming up sooner, it also delivered cabin heat sooner if the heater valve was open. When the original style thermostat at last opened the skirt in its design would slip in front of the opening in the tstat housing that fed the hose, effectively blocking that flow (no longer needed). When using a 'modern' thermostat (no such skirt) some choose to partially block that hose so it does not continue to allow some coolant to bypass the radiator... the feeling being that returning hot coolant directly to the head rather than sending (almost) all coolant thru the radiator would reduce cooling overall. Clearly there is not total agreement on whether this is necessary or even wise. Geo ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/triumphs-archive@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] Morgan Quadrant Gauge, Jonas Payne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] One last question NOW Restrictor flow, Randall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] One last question NOW Restrictor flow, Wbeech |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] One last question NOW Restrictor flow, Randall |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |