Subject: | [TR] [6pack] Negative battery cable? |
---|---|
From: | TR3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) |
Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:56:56 -0800 |
References: | <COL123-DS235B2E12521A242FB228B4F4C80@phx.gbl><A815E6DA-02B0-4C64-9E22-8F7F857C7765@comcast.net><327458D2905F45AF8A11BEF25F3232D6@ranteer.local> <8EFD37AB-ACCF-498E-BF84-AF5D10605993@comcast.net> |
> there was obviously a plan when they > manufactured the cables and I'm guessing they might have also > figured > out there was a few thousand other possible grounding options but > chose the two they did for good reason. Yes, but those reasons were probably things like saving a few cents on shorter cables, or a few seconds on the assembly line. It's not likely they have much to do with us today. -- Randall |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] [6pack] Negative battery cable?, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] TR3 Turn Signal Gremlin, Randall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] [6pack] Negative battery cable?, Randall |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] [6pack] Negative battery cable?, Bud Rolofson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |