To: | TR <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Ignition wire originality question |
From: | Geo Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com> |
Date: | Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:32:47 -0700 |
References: | <200407042122.i64LMmZo001411@autox.team.net> <002701c462ad$2f1f9640$6401a8c0@p4server> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Anthony Rhodes wrote: >...Allowing "period" accessories then DOES open a can of worms >about what consitiutes "period"... > So my "Winky the Cat" is okay? (ref: JCW catalog, Spring, 1959) >...what about the wires? > FWIW -- I have often switched wires from one cap to another w/o problem -- just get the spiky screw to hit the same spot. Sounds like the embossed cap with black wires is unambigiously original... anything else becomes a matter of opinion as to correctness. Personally, I consider radio static to be 'original' too. At the end of the day (as has been often pointed out before) it is your car and if bumble bee wires are to your liking then have at it. Geo Hahn 59 TR3A 64 TR4 Mt Lemmon, AZ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Ignition wire originality question, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: intake & exhaust manifold gaskets, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Ignition wire originality question, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | RE: Ignition wire originality question, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |