In a message dated 3/30/03 11:00:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Ryoung@navcomtech.com writes:
> It won't even take the 9th circuit to laugh at Jeff's "ex post facto"
> argument. The state will merely respond that it is not changing the
> emission limits for these cars; but only adding an inspection to be sure
> that they still meet original specifications.
More importantly, the "ex post facto" doctrine has long been held to apply
only to "penal" statues.
65 4A
Jim Macomber
CT54531
/// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|