triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SE vs. 175CD-2SEV

To: "'levilevi'" <levilevi@attbi.com>, "'6pack'" <6pack@autox.team.net>, "'triumphs'" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SE vs. 175CD-2SEV
From: Hugh Fader <hfader@usa.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:44:23 -0400
Cc: Nelson@BuckeyeTriumphs.org
Thanks for the advice Bud. Fortunately right now in Michigan, we are not
subject to emissions test. I think antiques were exempt when we were. I'll
keep this in mind should I ever have to pass emissions elsewhere.

- Hugh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: levilevi [mailto:levilevi@attbi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:28 AM
> To: Hugh Fader; '6pack'; 'triumphs'
> Cc: Nelson@BuckeyeTriumphs.org
> Subject: Re: Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SE vs. 175CD-2SEV
>
>
> Hugh,
>
> If you don't need to get an emissions test then you can cap
> the ports for
> the float chambers or  vent them.   You might have a
> difficult time passing
> an emissions test with the ports not connected properly and
> without the
> hoses from the carbon cannister to the carbs connected.  A
> friend was having
> problems getting his CO levels below the standard until we
> hooked everything
> up as it should be.  The theory was that the needles were
> setup for the air
> drawn from the cannister and the cannister flow was affected
> by the draw
> from the ports.  Don't know exactly what it was but he easily
> got the CO
> below the standards with all hoses connected (he had a three
> hole cannister

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>