To: | "'David A. Templeton'" <davidt@opentext.com>, "'Randall Young'" <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>, "'Triumphs@Autox Net (E-mail)'" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: TR2 to neg ground |
From: | Mark Hooper <mhooper@pixelsystems.com> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:10:19 -0500 |
Can somebody tell me what the rational was behind the change from Positive to Negative grounding. Electricity flows from negative to positive So I assume that was the idea behind the original positive ground system. It actually seems more sensible that way. But why the shift? Perception? Postive is higher? Or was there a better reason to do with corrosion etc...? Mark Hooper -----Original Message----- From: David A. Templeton [mailto:davidt@opentext.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:53 AM To: 'Randall Young'; 'Triumphs@Autox Net (E-mail)' Subject: RE: TR2 to neg ground > beyond making sure the lead from the battery to the starter > solenoid is > black, not red. > It is black :-) > The ones you have to worry about wouldn't pay any attention to a label > anyway ... > point well taken..... :-P David /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe triumphs /// /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: TR6 Wood Dash?, dstauffa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Club info, Kevin Andrews |
Previous by Thread: | RE: TR2 to neg ground, Steven Newell |
Next by Thread: | Re: TR2 to neg ground, Fred Thomas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |