triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: triumph baack

To: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
Subject: Re: triumph baack
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:36:40 +0000
Cc: David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>, Gary Nafziger <naffy@netins.net>, "[unknown]" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <007001c07daf$c6ef6360$168ceed0@PhilEthier>
Phil Ethier wrote:
> 
> Most cars today are Unibody and cutting off the top ruins the integrity of
> car.  It is very much more difficult to make a sturdy
> >convertible than a hard top and is not uncommon for the convertible to
> weigh much more than its hardtop counterpart.
> 
> True.  But cheap, rigid unibody roadsters are not impossible.  Spridgets are
> unibody.


Indeed they are, but they were designed as a convertible.  If they were 
designed to be a hard top, they undoubtedly would have been
lighter and the bracing components would have been designed differently.

Joe

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>