For limited production cars like our LBCs, it makes the engineering _much_
simpler. All of the problems with linkage routing (especially for RHD
cars), vibration/noise conducted through the linkage, mechanical advantage,
limited space, custom made parts, etc. just disappear when you switch to a
hydraulic system. (Note that the hydraulic parts were "off the shelf".)
Of course, it's also more complex, and more expensive to manufacture and
repair. But, IMO, almost as reliable for a car that is driven frequently.
Randall
On Friday, July 30, 1999 10:04 AM, gspens
[SMTP:gspens@interactivemediaworks.com] wrote:
>
> What is the advantage of a hydraulic clutch? Is it the old more parts
> to wear out faster bit, or is there a reason? Just wondering, I mean
> the pedal is right there, it seems like a lot of trouble to run that
> whole hydraulic system.
> Just wondering.
> I want to thank everyone thus far for their advice, I can't do
> anything till I leave work, but upon arriving this morning, I thought it
> was hopeless, now I at least, have some things to try.
> Thanks,
> Graham Spencer
> 70 TR6 (no clutch)
> 73 TR6 (waiting for engine transplant)
>
|