Ross
I don't have a car for sale, although if you found one that needs sheet
metal, I have a complete set. I really prefer the 4A and have a live axle
model. I have owned both as well as an AH3000 and an MGB. The 4 or 4A is
much more of a driver and brings more looks to swell the ego than the more
common 6's. I have found the 4 engine much easier to care for and if a
disaster ever occurs, it is easier to fix. I am glad to see more of the 4
and 4A's being restored and shown. I will gladly give up any popular choice
trophy to see more of the unique cars on the road.
Rick
TR4A CT57505L
----- Original Message -----
From: Ross Vincenti <RVincenti@lbfc.com>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 9:51 PM
Subject: TR6 or TR4 - which to buy?
>
> Scions:
>
> I have been following this thread with great interest as I have been
> looking for an early TR6 to replace the now departed Spit. I dare
say
> I have been swayed not only by the passion of the TR4 crowd (am I the
> only one to notice that far more 4 owners piped up about the virtues
> of their cars than 6 owners?), but also by the common sense points as
> well (brute torque, "hairy chested" British car feel, comparable
> horsepower, etc.)
>
> Perhaps I have been too hasty to assume that the 6s are a "better"
> car. Based upon the responses, I have decided to switch horses in
> mid-stream. So, anyone got a TR4 "driver" (no trailer queens need
> apply) that they want to sell to a dedicated enthusiast with a 3 car
> garage and one empty stall? Let me know.... regards to all.
>
> Ross Vincenti
> Temporarily Triumphless
> 64 Porsche 356 C coupe (pronounced "POR-SHUH") :-)
>
|