triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: List Etiquette

To: "INTERNET:ArthurK101@aol.com" <ArthurK101@aol.com>, "INTERNET:triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: List Etiquette
From: Tony Rhodes <ARhodes@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 08:13:58 -0500
Art,

(as I re-read this note, it sounds sarcastic.  It is not.  I earnestly
mean every word of it!)

You are absolutely right.  However, I bet that I am sometimes remiss also.
I find the help/wisdom available here invaluable/interesting.  I bet that
sometimes I have been pondering a gem so hard that I forgot
the simple thank-you it deserves.  So, I want to thank all those
people who have  thanklessly helped me (and others) in the past.
I hope that any small input I gave to the list made up for any apparent
lack of appreciation I had.  

A 2 hour research project certainly does deserve a thank-you!  I will
thank you for the other person!!!

-Tony
ARhodes@compuserve.com


Message text written by INTERNET:triumphs-owner@autox.team.net
>Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 13:43:59 EST
From: ArthurK101@aol.com
Subject: List Etiquette


THIS IS NOT A FLAME.  Please don't flame back.  Just a note about the list.
 I
have been on this list for 4 years.  Great folks and great info.  Last
night a
few other guys and I were talking about what has been happening lately. 
This
topic was addressed about 2 years ago and things did get better.

I'm talking about acknowledgement when someone spends time researching a
question or coming up with a solution to a problem sent to the list. 
Example,
I spent two hours the other day researching a question.  After I sent the
answer I never even got an acknowledgement that it was received - never
mind a
"thanks".

I know of two guys who were really helpful in the past who got off the list
for that very reason.  

So a gentle reminder.  Even if I enjoy doing this - Appreciation is always
appreciated.   (My mother was right).  It doesn't take much to click on
"reply" and type "Thanks."  Cheers.

Art Kelly

<


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>