triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Got the Diff. Figured out

To: James Densley <jamesd@wsunix.wsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Got the Diff. Figured out
From: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 08:07:01 -0700
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Netu>
   <  snip  >
>My question is, would it be too
>naughty to get a 3.27/1 version so I get better top end performance?  Am I
>thinking about this correctly?   I suspect that the higher ratios for the
>overdrive cars were installed to prevent engine over-reving when the o/d
>is disengaged.
   <  snip  >
********************************************
James,
I'm not quite sure what *you* mean by top end performance, but if you go
with 3:27 rear end ratio you will have slower acceleration, and a lower
cruising RPM in all gears, including overdrive (and really, in my opinion,
too tall for the GT6 OD in 4th).  The overall performance will match a non
overdrive GT6 with a stock 3:27 rear end ratio.  With the 3:89 ratio as
fitted to *most* overdrive GT6's you will recover some acceleration
performance lost with the higher ratio (off the line in all gears) and have
almost the same (actually just a tad lower) cruising RPM in overdrive 4th
as a stock 3:27 ratio'd car in fourth - 


Barry Schwartz (San Diego) bschwart@pacbell.net

72 V6 Spitfire (daily driver)
70 GT6+ (when I don't drive the Spit)
70 Spitfire (project)
73 Ford Courier (parts hauler, rain vehicle, getting a V6 soon!)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>