Thanks. I just got the Crane, but I'm thinking of returning it to
eliminate the Crane box in the engine compartment. Did the ignitor
fint under the distributor cap no problem?
Subject: Re: Crane versus Ignitor
Author: "Kevin N. Andrews" <kevina@emji.net> at SMTP
Date: 3/20/98 5:37 PM
I have put an ignitor in my 250 just last year. I can notice a differance
in the way the car runs. But the biggest differance is after the car sat
for two months that it fired right up. When I just had the points in the
car, it wouldn't start right off the bat.
But with the ignitor it fires up quick. It was also a sinch to put in.
Kevin Andrews
Siler City,NC
250's (CD2908LO)
(CD7766L)
----------
> From: jbonina@nectech.com
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Crane versus Ignitor
> Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 11:10 AM
>
>
> Listers,
>
> I apologize if this was already hashed over, I haven't been on the
> list all that long and I don't seem to remember seeing any specific
> discussion on the topic.
>
> Are there any real differences between after-market electronic
> ignitions? Specifically I'm talking about the Crane XR700 and
Ignitor.
>
> I've recently gotten *many* positive responses from users of the
Crane
> system. But, I've also received responses from others who criticize
> the Crane for 20 year old technology, external boxes, etc..
>
> Is there anyone out there who can speak for the Ignitor? Better yet,
> is there anyone who has used both? Am I asking for too much?
>
>
> Thanks folks,
>
> Jeff
> '73 TR6
|