John Peacock wrote:
>
> OK thats good too. But it should be done just the same.
>
> ----------
> > From: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>
> > To: pearesto@totcon.com
> > Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net; vtr-admin@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: VTR & VINs, Hoover, and the Registry
> > Date: Wednesday, October 29, 1997 9:39 AM
> >
> >
> > Maybe the best thing is for VTR to send a flyer out asking if we want
> our
> > names included in such a list. A non returned flyer would be implied
> > consent.. I think a list of all Triumphs would be great, not just
> >
> > At the moment, I'll just point out that it might be better to reverse
> this,
> > and assume that only RETURNED flyers provide consent.
> >
> > mjb.
John,
I agree, it should be done, and I think that only the returned ones
should be considered. But with the continued concern about privacy and
my desire not to lose the ones that don't want their names mentioned, I
propose that an additional piece of data be requestes. That being,
"indicate if you wish that your name be withheld from data about your
Spitfire?" I think that would encourage most people to participate and
appease the ones who want to protect their privacy. You still get a
sense of location from the City.
What do you think?
Joe Curry '63 Spit
|