triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Emmissions

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Emmissions
From: burdekij@bvsd.k12.co.us (Jane Burdekin)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:09:30 -0700
Thanks for that info, I would hate to have to replace the carbs.  Somehow I
have one extra carb sitting around, from the last time I switched them back
in maybe 1975.  I'll check into the dashpot and see if I can go that route.
Jane

>Those readings sound excessively high.  Hc is un-burnt fuel.  Here in
>Calif. (for now anyway till the first of next year. . .) the specs for my
>70 GT6 were under 500ppm for hc at idle.  Mine would only pass with new
>carbs, but even with the worn ones (jets worn, but needles replaced) it was
>just barely over that at around 550ppm.  Even with worn needles it was only
>around 650 ppm.  Sounds to me like your running excessively rich, and the
>only cure may be new carbs.  The jets are not replaceable, while the
>needles are.  Both wear, but only the needle is replaceable, and if that
>has already been done then your only recourse may be to replace...Also,
>check the little plastic restrictor in the line to your charcoal canister
>if you have one (not sure which year were talking about here) but you can
>lean the idle out somewhat by increasing this hole.  An easy way to tell if
>your running rich at idle is to remove the oil filler cap.  If the idle
>increases dramatically, its too rich.  The car should almost stall when the
>cap is removed
>
>Barry Schwartz in San Diego, CA
>
>Bschwartz@encad.com
>72-V6/5sp Spitfire ( daily driver )
>70 GT6+ ( when I don't drive the Spitfire )
>70 (sorta) Spitfire ( project )
>73  Ford Courier ( parts hauler )



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>