triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tri-SU's on a TR6

To: TriumphBee@aol.com
Subject: Re: tri-SU's on a TR6
From: "Randell Jesup" <jesup@mailhost.scala.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 97 15:41:05 EDT
Cc: british-cars@Autox.Team.Net (British-Cars), triumphs@Autox.Team.Net (Triumph Mailing List)
><<     Note: while triple SU's look cool, you'll almost certainly get more
> HP and torque by using two larger SU's (not to mention easier tuning).
>  >>
>
>   Thanks for the input.  One thing for sure is that the Federalized TR6
>suffers from poor breathing ability.  A six port fuel injection would be
>nice, but...

        I think there's someone selling one for $$$$; they have a web page
even (I don't remember the address though).

>    A number of "breathed on" MGB's have dual 1 3/4 in. SUs (same as my '6')
>and they're 0.7 liters smaller!  Maybe I'll look into a pair of  2 in. SUs.

        Aaron Johnson posted in response to the list with a good report
on a pair of HS8's (2").

        Note that our lumps don't turn as many RPM as the B's, though the
overall max airflow willbe a little higher on the '6 if the engines are in
similar levels of tune.  1.75" SU's are probably fine for a fairly stock or
mildly modified TR6, though they may start gasping above 4500-5000 RPM (like
the Zenith's).  2" SU's should be good enough even for fairly extreme levels
of tuning on a '6, though they'll give up a little to a sidedraft Weber at
the top end of a modified engine.  Not much, though, and they're much easier
to deal with (also, the tri-weber will suffer at low/mid rpm from the
uneven-intake-pulse problem).

-- 
Randell Jesup, Scala US R&D, Ex-Commodore-Amiga Engineer class of '94
Randell.Jesup@scala.com
#include <std/disclaimer>
Exon food: <offensive words no longer censored - thank you ACLU, EFF, etc>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>