Regarding the REPLY FROM: Kempinski, Robert M. about the 260 / 289
thing.......
>
>
>Steve Sage makes two fine points. I agree wholeheartedly with them.
>First, the point about using stuff on the floor - it's a reality.
Amen.
>>>>. Auto manufacturers could never afford to spend the money it
>takes to document everything. And certainly British manufacturers in the
60's,
>going rapidly downhill, and feeling the pinch of spiraling labor costs
>and inflation, weren't going to spend the money on documentation.
Amen #2.
>
>I believe using the rationale that no one sued Rootes for using a
>different engine as proof that they didn't switch engines is silly.
A big triple Amen !
> It is a sad commentary on our society today in that we ........... think
law suits..........
......... can also revise/prove history. Actually, such logic is downright
scary.
Amen. ......to the fourth power....
Have a nice weekend folks, and to some of you, please don't rush out and
try and sue someone if your
Tiger has the "wrong" engine in it.....
Rick Fedorchak
|