spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1275 exhaust manifold clamp

To: "Glen Byrns" <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: 1275 exhaust manifold clamp
From: "Paul Asgeirsson" <pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:16:15 -0700
Hi Glen,

Sounds like you made an initial fit pretty well, but then you put on the
clamp and tightened it!

How I've conquered this one is to oil all surfaces of the clamp, flange,
pipe, on both sides of everything prior to fitting the clamp and tightening
it.  You need the clamp to slip on the pipe as you tighten it instead of
pinching it and getting a couple of puckers on the -uckers as you tighten it
up!

Yes it gets sort of slippery handling it but if you tack weld the bolt head
to the washer and the washer to a clamp half, you have a whole bunch less
stuff to wrestle with as you curse the design while fitting it up!!

Later, Paul A

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Byrns" <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>
To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: 1275 exhaust manifold clamp


> The 1275 I'm fitting into the Austin has a stock early 1275 manifold.  Is
> there a trick to get the manifold to seal to the flared exhaust pipe?
With no
> gasket, I guess the clamp has to clamp the pipe to the manifold VERY
tightly?
> The Moss aftermarket clamp is a POS stamping that fits poorly.  Despite
> hammering out a decent flange flare on the pipe, the junction leaks both
noise
> and gas big time.  Any suggestions?
>
> I'd drop in a set of headers, but the angle on the commercial headers is
> designed to miss the frame rail on a bugeye, and that sends it right into
the
> frame rail of the A35.  Headers to fit this car would need to be a
straight
> drop, so are temporarily out of the question.
>
> Is the original early 1275 exhaust clamp a casting or stamping?  Does
anyone
> have one they would be willng to part with?
>
> Thanks,
> Glen Byrns




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>