To: | Daniel1312@aol.com, NewNGsInfo@cs.com, spridgets@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: rear discs was a Re: a revelation |
Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:04:20 EST |
In a message dated 11/22/2000 1:11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, Daniel1312@aol.com writes: << I fail to see why rear discs are good. >> I think it's a matter of philosophy. If rear brakes will help stop you when you want to be stopped, they are good. As are rear drum brakes. Therefore rear disc brakes are not bad, they are good. But in normal usage, they are no better than drum brakes, since the front brakes (discs, Good!) take about 80% of the load in a forward stop. Of course if you happen to be driving backwards. . . . <G> --David C. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re[2]: 2 amps, or nor 2 amps? THAT is the question..., Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: 2 amps, or nor 2 amps? THAT is the question..., Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: rear discs was a Re: a revelation, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: rear discs was a Re: a revelation, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |