spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: engine mounts?

To: "Joe Curry" <Spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: engine mounts?
From: "griffco" <griffco@griffco.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:00:23 -0700
The engine  is 'offset', but when looking along the head from the rear of
the chassis - it looks angled towards the left rear- therefore not truly
parallel.

I've sandblasted this thing and restored it -but can't see any evidence of
damage on the chassis or body.
All other parts fit back on true.

I've come to believe the motor is just crooked in the frame by design.
cheers, Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Curry" <Spitlist@gte.net>
To: "griffco" <griffco@griffco.ca>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: engine mounts?


>
>
> griffco wrote:
> >
> > Bill wrote:> >
> > > There's not much in it - attaching them to the chassis means you don't
> > have to worry about getting them vertically past the flanges on the
> > suspension tower as you lower the engine, but that's not really a big
deal.
> > Whichever way you choose, leave the mountings slack until everything is
> > located then tighten them all together. Ther is play in every plane with
> > these mountings,
> > >     Cheers,
> > >         Bill.
> >
> > Which brings up an earlier question I posted.  Now that the motor is
back in
> > the bare chassis, I notice that the engine is not exactly in line with
the
> > length of the chassis.  I couldn't find any movement in the mounts to
> > correct for this.
> >
> > Any one else?
>
> Are you saying that the engine is crooked to the chassis or that it is
> not exactly centered but is otherwise parallel to the frame rails.  I
> ask because the head on Spitfire engines sits slightly off center to the
> left.
>
> Joe

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>