Subject: | [Shop-talk] Plasma Cutter- the review |
---|---|
From: | tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall) |
Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:08:58 -0800 |
References: | <788978.26692.qm@web82406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <OFAC9B4B16.AAF35588-ON85257818.0074816F-85257818.007499FB@mail.megageek.com> <052c01cbb432$500a5510$f01eff30$@rr.com> <AANLkTi=-6cEmvuxJxkFvxMmY89zJfQNKtD0BJcNk_JSu@mail.gmail.com> |
> I'm willing to say > that cheap chinese tools use more air, but three times as much, for > less cutting abiity? I could certainly be mistaken; maybe it does use only 3.5 scfm. But I sure wouldn't want to bet $500 on it. Manufacturers are usually good at presenting their products in the best possible light, and being able to run with a small (portable) compressor would certainly be an advantage for a unit with a handle on the top. Maybe Moose can give us a measurement. Start cutting with a full tank of air and count seconds before the compressor kicks in. If you know the cut-in and cut-out pressures, plus the tank capacity, you can calculate roughly how many scfm you were drawing. -- Randall |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] Plasma Cutter- the review, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] Plasma Cutter- the review, eric |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] Plasma Cutter- the review, Randall |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] Plasma Cutter- the review, eric |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |