On Fri, 24 May 2002 ken.landaiche@nokia.com wrote:
> That price difference is also why the phone companies have been
> slow-rolling DSL for six years. DSL at $60/mo would kill their cash cow
> T1s at $1500/mo. DSL has forced that price down to the mid hundreds
> though.
get out! I thought the major outlay for t1 service was actually laying a
cable to your location from wherever? so it's $1500 just for service?
and dsl is a competitor? is it *that* fast compared to a t1?
and while we're on the subject...what's "t1" mean, anyway? and "t3"? and
what speeds do those designations represent, if any?
scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Randall Young [mailto:ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM]
> > all in all, I'm temped to ask what laying a t1 would cost.
>
> If twice the price of DSL scares you, don't even ask about a T1 ! Even if
> the pair is already run, the price will be many times that of DSL. Why ?
> Because they can ...
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/shop-talk
|