oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [oletrucks] ' 79 305 and S-10 motor mounts

To: "oletrucks" <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: [oletrucks] ' 79 305 and S-10 motor mounts
From: "Ralph Linnell" <chevysix@seatac.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 19:28:09 -0800
I had a 305 in my 1977 El Camino and it was the sweetest engine I ever had.
Gas mileage was 20/21 MPH on the highway and 16/18 MPH in town. It had
plenty of power, I never felt like I needed more. I ran it for over 150K
miles and never had as much as the valve covers off.

Ralph Linnell

Membership Chairman Inliners International

ChevySix@seatac.net
Http://www.seatac.net/chevysix/

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-oletrucks@autox.team.net
[mailto:owner-oletrucks@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Bruce Damen
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 7:06 PM
To: jelerath@us.ibm.com
Cc: ADvent@thuntek.net; Andy Johns; oletrucks
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] ' 79 305 and S-10 motor mounts

i had a 305 in one of my cutlusses ...it was ok power wise ( no 350 power
thou)
but as far as great gas mileage,  it was a pig on gas, as bad as the 350.
im
in the opinion of if your buying an engine go with the 350....if its free
thats
a different matter...your cam problem is solved when ya rebuild with a
better
cam

Bruce
1949 chev1/2 ton

jelerath@us.ibm.com wrote:

> I'm not a proponent of the 305, but doesn't if get better than 2 mpg?
>
> Jon Elerath
> jelerath@us.ibm.com
>
> ADvent@thuntek.net@autox.team.net on 02/18/2000 03:28:58 PM
>
> Please respond to ADvent@thuntek.net
>
> Sent by:  owner-oletrucks@autox.team.net
>
> To:   Andy Johns <andy51chevy@mindspring.com>
> cc:   oletrucks <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> Subject:  Re: [oletrucks] ' 79 305 and S-10 motor mounts
>
> everything else being equal, the 305 will give you about 2 mpg.
>
> Andy Johns wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all the in put.  The reason I looking at a 305 was the better
> gas
> > mileage though.  What would the gas mileage difference be between a 350
> and
> > a 305?  I'm working on a 16 year old's budget so gas mileage is
> important.
> > I was recently told that anything less than a 327 would have to work so
> hard
> > to move the truck, that there wouldn't be much difference in Gas
mileage.
> I
> > have heard of much smaller engines in the AD's though.  Is this guy off
> his
> > rocker?
> > The junk yards around here say $500 for a sound 350, and a 305 would be
> > $375.  That is another reason I chose the smaller engine.
> > Thanks,
> > Andy Johns
> > 1951 3100
> >
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>