To: | "Councill, David" <dcouncill@msubillings.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE! |
From: | Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:46:22 -0500 |
Darn, I didn't think of the earlier Bs. OK guys, I sit corrected. Thanks, CR Councill, David wrote: > I thought the reason for the dual master cylinder was redundancy so that > a rear or front brake failure would not end in total brake failure. This > was a USA mandated safety standard. Mk1 Bs had a single master cylinder. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Brake trouble, mghirsch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Hans Duinhoven |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Paul Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, yd3 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |