mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Engine Conversions alt. fuels

To: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>, mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Engine Conversions alt. fuels
From: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:53:02 -0800
Oh dear, my English humour goes unnoticed again.  My message re mining 
hydrogen was drenched in sarcasm - the lowest form of wit!

At 03:06 PM 1/30/2003 -0800, David Breneman wrote:
>Barrie Robinson SEZ -
> > So where does one mine hydrogen?  I mean you wouldn't have to burn coal,
> > gas or oil to produce the electricity to hydrolise water to produce
> > hydrogen would you?
>
>Yes you would.  That's the main thing that's kept hydrogen from
>becoming a commercially viable energy source.  It takes a lot
>more energy to separate it from water than it produces when
>burned.  About the only way you can even come close to making
>hydrogen a cost-effective fuel is to use nuclear power plants
>to create the power to separate it, and we all know what the
>environmentalists think of the prospect of building more of those!
>I'd imagine you're not going to see widespread use of hydrogen
>as a fuel until fusion power becomes commercially viable, and
>it seems to be one of those technologies that's perpetually
>"just around the corner".
>
>--
>David Breneman                   | "Before there were CDs there were
>Distributed Systems S/W Analyst  |  records, and before there were
>Airborne Express, Inc.           |  records, there were 78s."
>david.breneman@airborne.com      |                  --- Seen on eBay
>

Regards
Barrie

Barrie Robinson
barrier@bconnex.net 

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>