mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

rear axle dilemma

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: rear axle dilemma
From: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:52:54 -0700
I've run into a strange problem (or so it appears) on my son's 65B 
restoration. The back tires appear to be contacting the sidewalls at times.

The back tires were 175R75-14 tires and the front tires were 165R14s. My 
son swapped them and put the 165s on the rear but the problem still 
continues. I checked and could see no problem with the axle - ubolts are 
intact, leaf springs look okay, rear shocks feel solid. But I notice with 
the 165s, the distance between wheel well and tire is just enough to stick 
my finger in the gap (1/2 to 3/4 inch?) and the gap is slightly narrower 
(by 1/8 to 1/4"?) on the driver side. By comparison, my 72B has 
considerable more clearance, well over an inch to inch and a half or more, 
as do my BGTs.

It appears that the 65B's axle is a little wider. The 65B, I believe, 
should use the banjo style axle. Should this axle be slightly wider than 
the newer type? Are there any markings to determine if the axle is correct 
in the 65B? I haven't had a chance to take a closer inspection yet because 
I'm short a jack stand - one is missing and one set is holding up the 72B 
body shell right now. Any Mark 1 owners out there who could verify this 
tight clearance to tell me if its an anomaly?

David

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>