To: | <Flowbench@aol.com>, <v4gr@rcn.com>, <john@engr.wisc.edu>, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: What's Up? |
From: | "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:18:56 -0700 |
List, This is an interesting topic to me. My new car is just over 7 sq. ft. including the exposed tire section and the vertical fin. Some people have commented how big it is. It's real easy until you try to do it. Howard ----- Original Message ----- From: <Flowbench@aol.com> To: <v4gr@rcn.com>; <john@engr.wisc.edu>; <drmayf@teknett.com> Cc: <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:45 PM Subject: Re: What's Up? > In a message dated 11/5/01 10:33:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, v4gr@rcn.com > writes: > > << I suppose and 7sq. ft. sounds like alot. >> > > I think you'll find that the Golden rod was 11 sq. ft. But the smaller the > frontal the better. Ask Jack. > > Mike /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe land-speed /// /// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | frontal area/drag coefficient, Glenn Ridlen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Pahrump Exposed!, Ed Van Scoy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: What's Up?, Richard Fox |
Next by Thread: | Re: What's Up?, ardunbill |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |