Dave,
Welcome to the group! You pose some good questions, I only wish that I
had the right answers.
You will find that in landspeed racing there are less "cookie cutter"
cars. Each car has its own personality. I think that most everyone
starts by working on horsepower, however, there comes a time when
aerodynamics gets more attention. They are really two side to the same
coin. More horsepower will move a poorly streamlined vehicle faster, but
better streamline requires less horsepower. Unfortunately, improving
either category will drain your wallet.
One of the problems we have with the various classes is that there are
built in limits to what you can do with streamlining, so more horsepower
appears to be the only alternative.
Tom, Redding CA 1:15 PM PST
Dave Lum wrote:
>
> I've been lurking since this list had four members I think (hey, it's
> Chuck's fault I'm here anyhow) and Wow! this list has grown in the few short
> months it's been around - nice to see all the participation!
>
> I have a "basic moron question of curiousity". Do most of you spend more
> time into the aerodynamic development or developing more engine power? This
> probably varies with the classes I realize - or is it similar to some other
> race-car type stuff where you can get an engine from shop A (where other
> land-speed guys might go) and chassis from shop B - or is it more like "hey,
> I wanna see how fast I can get this old brick to go" and develop from an
> on-hand platform?
>
> If those questions bore you - what are some of your main reasons for doing
> this? 1) To set a record 2) To see how fast you can afford to go 3) To
> see how broke you can go before calling it quits (ok that last one doesn't
> really count) 4) some other reason?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave Lum
> www.datsuns.com
|