Keith,
Your 296 displ. would be right at the edge of the 3% factor allowed for our
pumps. 305.99999 x .97 = 296.
In this case we would attempt to use the pump and allow for engine temp.
Another thing we try to do is allow entrants to have an independent source
measure and seal an engine before coming to the salt. The log book is an
excellent resource for this purpose.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>
To: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>Thanks for hanging out Dan... Kinda nice to see you joining in.... add's a
>little credibility to what we are doing here...
>
>I know your just one Person but your opinion and familiarity with the rules
>... well bud that just works.... Oh and by the way Maybe I can tear a head
>off for you next year....
>
>since my motor last year was a 296 would you have done a tear down ? for a
>D motor?
>
>K
>
>----------
>> From: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
>> To: kturk@ala.net
>> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 9:50 AM
>>
>> By-laws, minutes, tribal knowledge - access to these items probably would
>> not help vis a vis rules. The best route if a rule concern exists is to
>> contact the proper class committee. If you don't know the committee chair
>> directly, contact through the current head tech guy as listed in the rule
>> book is the way to go.
>>
>> Questions regards the way an event operates can be answered via a letter
>to
>> the Board, via the SCTA-BNI office or through this forum.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>
>> To: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>; dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
>> <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 6:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>>
>>
>> >Dan.... As Chuck mentioned from the SCCA folks.. rule book.... we be
>Thin
>> >
>> >I love our rule book for it's simplicity... sure we can argue about
>certain
>> >Items... but the overall rules are great in their latitude....
>> >
>> >I do have a question about things that have been discussed in the past
>and
>> >settled on that are not in the rule book... someone mentioned By-laws
>and
>> >minutes or some other form of clarification about the rules.... Is there
>> >more that I should be reading?
>> >
>> >Keith Turk.... (happy to get through tech... that first time)
>> >
>> >----------
>> >> From: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
>> >> To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
>> >> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> >> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>> >> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:35 AM
>> >>
>> >> The definition in the rulebook for spoiler vrs. wings has been around
>for
>> >a
>> >> long time. Page 38, item h, 2nd sentence refers to single aero
>surface.
>> >> Generally a single surface device is air flow over the top, a spoiler
>> >with
>> >> air flow over the top and bottom is defined as a wing by the SCTA-BNI.
>> >Some
>> >> aero people may disagree in this area, however, to keep it simple this
>is
>> >> the way the SCTA sees it.
>> >>
>> >> On a production car with a spoiler/wing if the device is raised from
>the
>> >> body it is defined as a wing also.
>> >>
>> >> Dan
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>> >> To: dwarner@electrorent.com <dwarner@electrorent.com>;
>> >> Land-speed@autox.team.net <Land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> >> Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 12:19 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >hi dan, thanks for the compliment, it was a hell of alot of work to
>> >design
>> >> >and build it. on the spoiler, should i take it that if i say why i
>> >think
>> >> >it fully meets the requirements of the 98 and 99 scta rules ( i
>fabbed
>> >it
>> >> >myself when the 98 rules were applicable) that the 2000 rules will be
>> >> >deliberately modified to send this spoiler to the scrapyard ? wow- i
>> >dont
>> >> >know how to comment
>> >> >
>> >> >doug@black radon engineering
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
|