land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FW: spoilers

To: "'joe boogie'" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>, dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com,
Subject: RE: FW: spoilers
From: "Ferguson, Darrell" <dfergus@bactc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 16:13:45 -0800
That's us Doug!

        Doug and I have finally tried to incorporate the many years of
wrenching etiquette that our dad has passed on to us in our Bonneville Car.
It was 1987 when my father and I went to Bonneville for the first time. We
loved it ! Through the years we've run the gambit from street racing, to
customs (had too many points against my license, so I had to cool it for a
while) to the drags, and now to Bonneville. It's basically a family race
team. Unfortunately, pop doesn't get to come out to California too often, so
Doug and I trade ideas for the car via E-mail, or call pop on the phone for
his input. Once we iron out the bugs in the car, we're throwing him in his
firesuit and lettin him take a few blasts in it. It's not a modified
roadster, but Doug and I think that he'll like it. As for Dan, I don't know
that I've ever met him, but from what I can read in his E-mails, he seems
like a nice guy.
         I guess Doug and I have a pretty serious attitude about our car.
Doug has taxed his marriage, and I lost my girlfriend of 5 years, and we
both sink every dollar we can scrape up, jeopardize our careers and
friendships, all in the name of racing this car. I know every guy in here
has gone through some trials and tribulations in the name of racing yet I
often feel like we keep paying the price for our dedication to race the
salt. We still wait to enjoy the rewards of success that everyone else here
has already experienced. 


Darrell Ferguson
BLACK RADON ENGINEERING
# 939 BBFALT
http://my.cybersoup.com/blackradon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joe boogie [SMTP:boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 4:48 PM
> To:   dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com; land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Fw: spoilers
> 
> DOUG:
>             BOTH OF YOU RASCALS ARE BRUCE FURGESON'S KIDZ...RIGHT?    I'M
> A 
> FRIEND OF YER OL' MAN, SO YA BOTH BETER TREAT OL' DAN RIGHT.
> RIGHT DAN?    -YEAH DAN' YOU'VE MET ME ON THE SALT; -BACK IN '89-'90 WHEN
> I 
> CAME DOWN FROM MONTANA WITH GEORGE CAMPBELL AND HANK LAW'SHE AND THE WHOLE
> 
> CRAZY BUNCH!     SMALL WORLD HUH?  HI TO ALL OF YA .
> I AM FOLLOWIN' YOUR DISCUSSIONS WITH MUCH INTEREST......
> 
>                                   "DIRTY DOUG" IN NY
> 
> 
> >From: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
> >Reply-To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
> >To: land-speed@autox.team.net, dwarner@electrorent.com
> >Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
> >Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:28:49 -0500
> >
> >hi dan, i took a walk out to my car to get my scta rulebook and noticed
> all
> >thes cars with air gaps between the trunklid and spoiler in the parking
> lot
> >- ford escort, pontiac bonneville and grand am, volkswagen jetta,
> >mitsubishi eclipse, nissan maxima, acura integra, dodge colt, i could
> keep
> >going but i think you get my point. it is safe to assume that all these
> >cars have production "wings" according to the scta rules ? . my apologies
> >that i dont know you better but i would assume you play an active part in
> >the scta rules, so i'm probably "shooting myself in the foot" based on
> the
> >2000 rules have yet to be determined and will quite possibly change
> because
> >of this dicussion, but i guess i might as well die trying to prove the
> >legality of the spoiler on our vehicle. section IV 26 h) states a couple
> of
> >things. first, it states that "when the spoiler is laid flat" - i assume
> >that this means it can be adjusted for "angle of attack", which would
> >probably require some gap unless a cheesy piano hinge setup or similar is
> >used.  it also states that "plates are permitted to fill in horizontal
> >spoiler/body gap." so right there the scta acknowledged in writing that a
> >gap may exist right in the spoiler definition. we just chose not to fill
> >the gap on our spoiler - it says "permitted" , not required. and as you
> >mentioned your interpretation of "a single aerodynamic surface" is
> >different from ours. i guess it gets philisophical how many surfaces are
> on
> >a flat sheet of metal?, teardropped shaped? , egg shaped?, spherical? -
> >well, at least we can still run the spoiler at the drags if the rules
> >change. by the way, i'm darrell's brother doug in cased you are confused
> >
> >regards-
> >doug @ black radon engineering
> >
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>