This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============8019927614232588294==
boundary="------------688F2DED797418A1941804B7"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------688F2DED797418A1941804B7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This doc--from the government, so it HAS to be true ;)--claims cogged,
or 'synchronous,' are most efficient:
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56012.pdf
Now I have to deal with smooth/standard, cogged, and 'notched' (what's
the diff?).
bs
On 10/17/2021 8:13 AM, Michael Salter wrote:
> As I recall the original belt for a 100 is a Ferodo V161.
> Â I have been using a B-45 Gates belts which sit a little lower in the
> pulley but don't contact the bottom of the pulley groove.
> https://www.biedlers-belts.com/gates-b45-belt.html
> <https://www.biedlers-belts.com/gates-b45-belt.html>
>
> M
>
>
> On Sun., Oct. 17, 2021, 10:16 a.m. David P via Healeys,
>
> Gates belts has a belt for industrial equipment (non automotive)
> that is an excellent copy of the original. Unfortunately I don't
> remember the part number.. (gets worse with age). I found it
> googling their web pages.. B1 kinda rings a bell.. happy hunting. DP
>
> On 10/17/2021 8:01 AM, Bob Spidell wrote:
>> I'm going to return it, with '8x10 colored glossy photographs.'
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/2021 6:43 AM, warthodson@aol.com
>>> Bob,
>>> The way the vendors find out about an issue is if the customer
>>> tells them. You should forward your message to Moss.
>>> Gary Hodson
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
>>> Sent: Sat, Oct 16, 2021 7:52 pm
>>> Subject: [Healeys] BN2 Fan Belt
>>>
>>> I finally got around to fixing my loose water pump pulley and
>>> installing a new fan belt. I ordered a 'cogged' belt from
>>> Moss--part# 021-966--thinking it might work better than the
>>> original slab of rubber. I noticed before installing that it was
>>> narrower than the original type that I'd had, which had rotted,
>>> but it looked like it would work. Once I started tensioning it
>>> however, it was clear it /might /work, but sat too low in the
>>> pulleys, and was essentially riding on the bottom of the pulley
>>> grooves instead of on the sides (and the angle of the sides of
>>> the belt was incorrect). Anyone else tried one of these?
>>>
>>> I'm shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YA', that a vendor would sell
>>> something that could possibly work, but isn't truly correct.
>>>
>>> bs
>>>
>>
--------------688F2DED797418A1941804B7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
This doc--from the government, so it HAS to be true ;)--claims
cogged, or 'synchronous,' are most efficient:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56012.pdf";>https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56012.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Now I have to deal with smooth/standard, cogged, and 'notched'
(what's the diff?).<br>
<br>
bs<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/17/2021 8:13 AM, Michael Salter
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB3i7LLCRORTQvzhGi23aVhgY3vUSJJt38eDYf36=QRdSAYPAw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">As I recall the original belt for a 100 is a
Ferodo V161.
<div dir="auto">Â I have been using a B-45 Gates belts which sit
a little lower in the pulley but don't contact the bottom of
the pulley groove.</div>
<div dir="auto"><a
href="https://www.biedlers-belts.com/gates-b45-belt.html";
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.biedlers-belts.com/gates-b45-belt.html</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">M</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun., Oct. 17, 2021, 10:16
a.m. David P via Healeys, <<a
href="mailto:healeys@autox.team.net"; target="_blank"
rel="noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true">healeys@autox.team.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Gates belts has a belt for industrial equipment (non
automotive) that is an excellent copy of the original.
Unfortunately I don't remember the part number.. (gets
worse with age). I found it googling their web pages.. B1
kinda rings a bell.. happy hunting. DP <br>
</p>
<div>On 10/17/2021 8:01 AM, Bob Spidell wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> I'm going to return it, with '8x10
colored glossy photographs.'<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 10/17/2021 6:43 AM, <a
href="mailto:warthodson@aol.com"; rel="noreferrer
noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">warthodson@aol.com</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="color:black;font:12pt Comic Sans
MS,sans-serif">Bob,
<div>The way the vendors find out about an issue is if
the customer tells them. You should forward your
message to Moss.</div>
<div>Gary Hodson<br>
<br>
<br>
<div
style="font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black"><font
size="2">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Bob Spidell <a
href="mailto:bspidell@comcast.net";
rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true"><bspidell@comcast.net></a><br>
To: Healeys <a
href="mailto:healeys@autox.team.net";
rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true"><healeys@autox.team.net></a><br>
Sent: Sat, Oct 16, 2021 7:52 pm<br>
Subject: [Healeys] BN2 Fan Belt<br>
<br>
<div
id="m_-8497860751573058673m_2714273202460204982yiv8575284951">
<div> I finally got around to fixing my loose
water pump pulley and installing a new fan
belt. I ordered a 'cogged' belt from
Moss--part# 021-966--thinking it might work
better than the original slab of rubber. I
noticed before installing that it was
narrower than the original type that I'd
had, which had rotted, but it looked like it
would work. Once I started tensioning it
however, it was clear it <i>might </i>work,
but sat too low in the pulleys, and was
essentially riding on the bottom of the
pulley grooves instead of on the sides (and
the angle of the sides of the belt was
incorrect). Anyone else tried one of these?<br>
<br>
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YA', that a
vendor would sell something that could
possibly work, but isn't truly correct.<br>
<br>
bs<br>
</div>
</div>
</font><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------688F2DED797418A1941804B7--
--===============8019927614232588294==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/healeys http://autox.team.net/archive
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
--===============8019927614232588294==--
|