healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Double Flare versus Bubble Flare

To: "'Harold Manifold'" <manifold@telus.net>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Double Flare versus Bubble Flare
From: Henry G Leach via Healeys <healeys@autox.team.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 04:30:35 +0000 zF0FkMoy0Mo6PZfZcMRPl9Hn+jA8sP7ovffm32a/R8jYKYUXUGgey8cbd2Oj5NHXAKMMh4zF3F8w9Q==
Cc: "'healeys@autox.team.net'" <healeys@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
Importance: Normal
--===============1907469330430174180==
 boundary="=_f74411b72e09bfcabde4fb7547d58224"

--=_f74411b72e09bfcabde4fb7547d58224
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Girling had their own flare as seen here on the chart.=0A=0A=09---------=
--------------------------------From: "Harold Manifold via=0AHealeys"=
 =0ATo: healeys@autox.team.net=0ACc: =0ASent: Saturday July 25 2020 8:27=
:01PM=0ASubject: [Healeys] Double Flare versus Bubble Flare=0A=0A   When=
 I took my old brake lines off I notice they had a double flare=0Aend wh=
ere they connected to the brake and clutch master cylinders but=0Athe in=
ternals of the master cylinder fitting looks like a 45 deg DIN=0Aflare.=
 I would have thought a male swivel nut with bubble flare should=0Abe us=
ed when the female fitting has an angled bottom. I am wondering=0Aif the=
 flare on the brake and clutch was modified at some time. It=0Amakes sen=
se to connect the double flare end to a fitting with and=0Ainverted flar=
e bottom but not to an angled bottom.   Am I missing=0Asomething? I have=
 an AH3000 built in November 1960. Does anyone know=0Awhere the bubble f=
lare should be used?   Thanks... Harold

--=_f74411b72e09bfcabde4fb7547d58224
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body>Girling had their own flare as seen here on the chart.<br><b=
r><div class=3D"reply-new-signature"></div><p>--------------------------=
---------------</p>From: "Harold Manifold via Healeys" <healeys@autox.te=
am.net><br>To: healeys@autox.team.net<br>Cc: <br>Sent: Saturday July 25=
 2020 8:27:01PM<br>Subject: [Healeys] Double Flare versus Bubble Flare<b=
r><br>=0A<meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii" http-equiv=3D"C=
ontent-Type">=0A<meta name=3D"GENERATOR" content=3D"MSHTML 11.00.10570.1=
001">=0A<div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span class=3D"380290203-26=
072020">When I took my old =0Abrake lines off I notice they had a double=
 flare end where they connected to the =0Abrake and clutch master cylind=
ers but the internals of the master cylinder =0Afitting&nbsp;looks like=
 a 45 deg&nbsp;DIN flare. I would have thought a male =0Aswivel nut with=
 bubble flare should be used when the female fitting has an =0Aangled bo=
ttom. I am wondering if the flare on the brake and clutch was modified=
 =0Aat some time. It makes sense to connect the double flare end to a fi=
tting with =0Aand inverted flare bottom but not to an angled bottom.</sp=
an></font></div>=0A<div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span class=3D"3=
80290203-26072020"></span></font>&nbsp;</div>=0A<div><font size=3D"2" fa=
ce=3D"Arial"><span class=3D"380290203-26072020">Am I missing =0Asomethin=
g? I have an AH3000 built in November 1960. Does anyone know where the=
 =0Abubble flare should be used?</span></font></div>=0A<div><font size=
=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span class=3D"380290203-26072020"></span></font>&=
nbsp;</div>=0A<div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span class=3D"380290=
203-26072020">Thanks... =0AHarold</span></font></div></healeys@autox.tea=
m.net></body></html>

--=_f74411b72e09bfcabde4fb7547d58224--


--===============1907469330430174180==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/healeys http://autox.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys



--===============1907469330430174180==--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>