David -
Don't forget you're in Stockton. Even if there was an MOT requirement
for California, you'd still have all of these dangerous cars because
they would still qualify for that very special drivers' "cross border"
exemption, where the owner isn't required to register his car or have
a driver's license for that matter.
Cheers!
Alan
On 9/15/07, David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> And it shows the amount of cars I see that have bald tires, no
> brakes, cracked windshields etc that should not be on the road is
> scarry.
>
>
>
> David Nock
> British Car Specialists
> Stockton Ca 95205
> 209-948-8767
>
> www.britishcarspecialists.com
> .
> .
>
> On Sep 14, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Rick Snover wrote:
>
> > At 01:27 PM 9/14/2007, sbyers@ec.rr.com wrote:
> >> In North Carolina, cars 35 years old and older do not have to be
> >> inspected
> >> at all - neither smog nor normal safety inspection.
> >
> > FWIW - California has no safety inspection requirements at all,
> > regardless
> > of the vehicle's age.
> >
> > Rick
> > _______________________________________________
> > healeydoc@sbcglobal.net
> >
> > Healeys@autox.team.net
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
> _______________________________________________
> healey.nut@gmail.com
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
--
Alan
'52 A90
'53 BN1
'64 BJ8
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
|