I don't know a lot about cam specs but the difference doesn't look that
great, is the M cam considered a fairly "mild" cam? for an engine that
doesn't rev muc I suppose a radical cam may not really be that effective?
Greg Lemon
54 BN1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Salter" <michaelsalter@rogers.com>
To: "'Mike MacLean'" <macleans@earthlink.net>; <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: Healey 100 Cam Specs
> This is what I have Mike.
>
> 100 cam specs:
> Lift 0.390"
> Timing @ 0.021" 5, 45, 40, 10
> Duration 230
>
> 100M (and S) cam specs:
> Lift 0.435"
> Timing @ 0.021" 10, 50, 45, 15
> Duration 240
>
> IMHO cam profiling has come a long way since the days when these were
> developed and there are better profiles around now.
> In our Targa engine we are running 0.485" lift
> Timing @ 0.021" 49, 77, 77, 49.
> Duration 306
> This engine still pulls very strongly from 1200 RPM.
>
> Michael Salter
> www.precisionsportscar.com
|