I think that is the same software I used. I did not find an appreciable
difference between the two methods (shortening the A arms or moving the
pivots inwards). You don't really need suspension software to look at
this simple stuff. I found a spreadsheet agreed with it and was not as
cumbersome.
On 3/10/2013 7:06 PM, Bill Babcock wrote:I
> According to the analysis I did with my suspension software (SuspPro) the
> most useful way to change camber on a TR3 is to move the upper arms inward
> and kee.p them the same length. I use the TR6 bits to get caster and cut the
> upper arms to add heim joints to make an adjustable arm, but the length is
> close to stock, just has the pivot moved inwards.
>
> If you shorten the upper A arms you wind up with a lot of camber at full
> bump. It's also pretty hard to get the bump steer out with shorter arms, the
> outer pivot point moves well inside the lower pivot.
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
|