JACK
THANKS FOR THE "CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE TYPE OF FRONT SPOILER SVRA HOLDS
ACCEPTABLE. THAT IS WHAT I AM IN THE PLANNING STAGES OF PRODUCING. I WANT TO
USE IT ON THE TR3, HOWEVER. ANY PROBLEM WITH THIS?
STEVE P.
----- Original Message -----
From: jwoesvra@aol.com
To: spreiss@verizon.net ; kaskas@cox.net ; dave@microworks.net ;
fot@autox.team.net
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Fot] So a question?
What
about fared plexi windscreens allowed by SVRA? Are they any less out of
character from the original look than the dams?
I have been away for a week but y'all may have already finished this
conversation. I have said it many times before but perhaps not on the TR
list.....it is all about appearance.The Perspex windscreen (read Lexan) is a
nice safety upgrade that does not detract from the appearance of the car. The
period rules allowed windshield removal and required a racing windscreen. I
don't even understand your statement.I can't for the life of me understand why
you guys want to hang these air dams on your cars and then argue about
"period" or "non-period" appearance.
Look at the old pictures and replicate what the real racers did in "the day".
Don't come up with crap that didn't happen and try to justify a reason for it.
Get your noses out of the "boy racer" catalogs and try to get in the spirit of
what we do. Why can't you make a spoiler that replicates what the guys like
Kas and Bob Tullius used? Why do you have to buy a POS fiberglass AIRDAM? I
fight this battle all the time. If you want the modern look and think that is
KOOL, SCCA or NASA will be happy to take your money.Jack WoehrleSVRA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|