Did you'all study the photos sent us by the Vitesse racer? Dont know the
dates, cause I had to delete the files, but yes later than 68. However many
of the usual suspects are pictured. Everyone was getting into the airdam act
by then. And no pretense of brake cooling is apparent. Could someone explain
the logic to justify that because only the Datsuns officially got away with
it at the time, that only the Datsuns are allowed to run them now. What
about fared plexi windscreens allowed by SVRA? Are they any less out of
character from the original look than the dams?
Steve P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
To: <JWoesvra@aol.com>; <dave@microworks.net>; <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Fot] So a question?
> I have shown photos to many of the double spoiler we had on the TR-250 and
a
> few arguments with the tech folks. ( the photo is in one of my books) The
> hoses from the double layer spoiler were kind of small, but as I told the
> tech inspector, I could not be blamed that my engineers were not very
good.
> I see this fellow every once in a while and we do laugh about it now. No
> joke then though. BUT, this is was not an air dam. Looked at that but the
> car looked so bad we could not justify running it and gathering the ire of
> the sales dept. This was a time when bad was just plain bad. Brock gets
the
> kudos for the air dam. damn!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <JWoesvra@aol.com>
> To: <dave@microworks.net>; <fot@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Fot] So a question?
>
>
> > In a message dated 3/9/2008 11:16:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > dave@microworks.net writes:
> >
> > Since Peter Brock was able to get a full car width "brake duct" that
> > also functioned as an airdam allowed in 1968 could you run a car with
> > a Vintage group using post 1968 rules with one of these brake
> > duct/airdams? Even if their rules specifically outlaw an airdam as
> > they did in 1968?
> >
> >
> >
> > Only if you have a Datsun roadster or 510. The BRE (Brock Racing
> > Enterprises) "spook" is legal. I guess you Triumph guys never look over
> > the fence.
> >
> > Anyhow, you cannot put a spook on anything else. Sorry, Kas thought of a
> > lot
> > of tricks but missed that one!
> >
> > You can go to _www.svra.com_ (http://www.svra.com/) and look at the
> > Datsun
> > Supplemental Regulation for Roadsters. It shows a pictute of the spook.
> >
> > Jack Woehrle
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
> > Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.team.net/donate.html
> >
> > Fot mailing list
> > Fot@autox.team.net
> > http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
> >
> > You are subscribed as kaskas@cox.net
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>
> You are subscribed as spreiss@verizon.net
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|