Keith Gustafson commented:
> I have to agree that the seven list is a disappointment to me as a Lotus
> Seven owner, it has a lot of traffic about various seven clones, but very
> little relevant to original sevens.
I've never been subscribed to the 7 list, so this is interesting news to
me. I'm a little surprised that there isn't more carried-over interest,
but maybe the clones are more different in spirit than I realize. Maybe
chapman-era could be doing original 7 owners a service? Hmmm.
> I was thinking of
> suggesting that the Lotus Seven people might hang out on the chapman era
> list [err, maybe I just did]
What do other chapman-era residents who get the 7 list mail, think about
this idea? Should we be recruiting folks presently on the 7 list, as
potential chapman-era customers?
Let us know what you think,
Erik Berg
|