bricklin
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 74vs 75

To: bricklin@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: 74vs 75
From: Michel Poulin <mpoulin@poulincomm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
  I knew there was a 351C, but I didn't know that threr was a 351w (or m
for that matter). I need to do some reading up on these engines.
 Thanks!!!
 -=mike=-

*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
| http://www.poulincomm.com   |
| http://www.WWJP.com         |
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*

On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Phil Martin wrote:

> Putting almost any flavor of 351W in a 75 or 76 should be very
> straightforward.  The only issues I know of are:
> 
>       o Internal vs. External balancing
>       o Electronics like EFI etc.
>       o Intake and exhaust manifolds, water pumps, and other
>         accessories clearing other stuff in the engine
>         compartment.
> 
> You can certainly make an _awful lot_ more power from a 351W than the 175hp
> Granada motor in the Bricklin.  Ford Motorsport sells a naturally aspirated
> crate motor that makes 380hp on pump gas, for example.
> 
> Be aware, though, that the 351W (Windsor) has _nothing_ in common with the
> earlier 351C (Cleveland).  The 351C used to be preferred because it made way
> more power from the factory, and had massive valves, ports, and compression.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>