To: | Rocky Entriken <rocky@tri.net>, NER Solo postings <nersolo@ner.org>, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers |
From: | Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:16:44 -0500 |
But if they "soften" the impact (pun intended?) of obsolescing our helmets, and an incident occurs, what happens then? The lawyers would have their way with us. I'm wagering it will happen sooner than later. Matt Murray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net> > I really do not believe we can prevent this -- "safety" issues always > seem impervious to any objections -- but we might get it imposed in a more > user-friendly manner (if a new helmet you must buy, would you not rather be > able to get a Snell 2005 than a Snell 2000 that already has 4 years of its > rulebook life gone?) > > --Rocky |
Previous by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Matt Murray |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Coolwalker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers, Rocky Entriken |
Next by Thread: | Re: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers, Mark Andy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |