autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack)

To: tr6nut@sbcglobal.net, knuckledragger@kcweb.net
Subject: Re: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack)
From: Hottvr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:18:14 EDT
I still watch the list but don't run a car anymore. I still have an SSCA 
membership
so I feel I can comment on this issue. I think one thing Hugh fails to 
realize is this.
If you based entry into the Nationals on Divisional finishes, you would have 
a very
strange Nationals. The last year I ran in 2001, I did a little research. I 
was running
in CM. When I looked at the the entries at the Nats for 1997-2000 I found 
that if
you were  to take a map of the US and draw a radius of 300 miles around 
Indianapolis Indiana you had about 70% of all the fields entries in  the class. 
If 
you only allowed the top half of CM that fell in that circle to run at the 
Nats. You would eliminate some very good drivers and cars. In some regions 
CM(Just as an example)
has no cars running, in others like Cen-Div there are lots of cars in the 
class.
The way the Nationals  are now is how  it should be. Bring what you got, and 
do the
best you can.  



Mike B. 

In a message dated 7/5/03 7:44:15 PM Central Daylight Time, 
tr6nut@sbcglobal.net writes:


> 2. Mere attendance at a National Tour or Divisional event should not 
> qualify
> you for the National Championships.  You should have to finish at least in
> the top half of your class (maybe even the top 3 or 4) in order to go to the
> Nationals.  The Championships should be a meeting of the best of the best -
> not the way it is now (best of the best + those with time/money to attend +
> those who live in the Midwest).

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>